ISLAND COUNTY COMMISSIONERS   -  MINUTES OF MEETING

SPECIAL SESSION     MAY 7, 2002

 

The Board met in Special Session on May 7, 2002 at  9:30 a.m. in  budget workshop to review and discuss how the budget shortfall for  2003 could be addressed within the Island County Sheriff’s Budget  and the Prosecuting Attorney’s Budget.  The workshop was  preliminary only and no decisions made.  The  Budget Director, several Elected Officials, Appointed Department Heads and staff  attended.  

 

Island County Sheriff’s Budget

Presentation by:      Mike Hawley, Sheriff 

Staff:                   Jan Smith; Russ Lindner, J. D. Burns

         Hand-out:             Copy of Overhead Budget Presentation

 

2002 Sheriff’s Budget

 

         Criminal/Civil Division                   $ 3,341,272

          Corrections Division                1,356,193

                              Total:                    $ 4,697,465

 

Budget Savings Already Made in 2002:    S/W/B   $238,255   M&O  $15,000

 

·       Privatized jail food services

·       Eliminated: [now all patrol deputies]

                  Chief Criminal Deputy  Position        Lieutenant’s Position

                           Detectives Position                       Evidence Custodian Position

·       Five positions unfilled  [3-N. precinct; 1-S. precinct; 1-E precinct]

·       Reduced motor pool vehicles by one   

·       Disbanded Swat Team

·       Non-mandated training  eliminated

 

Of the total amount saved,  actual savings  will be $63,000 by the end of the year  because of necessary items that have to be funded for  2002, including:  employee retirement cash-outs; contracted specialty pays; fuel and overtime.

 

Vehicles are turned in with 120,000 to 150,000 miles; 9 cars are needed next year just to keep pace.  SWAT Team was disbanded because the Sheriff could not pay for training for those specialized positions.  Non-mandated training eliminated includes for example  first aid training and  defense tactics.  Need funding for over time because it is absolutely required in certain instances, for example, the Air Show coming up which will easily cost $15,000.  The Department is currently on probation with the FBI because of not having enough time to do self-audits required and the Department in jeopardy of not having the ability to do criminal history checks.

 

Sheriff’s Office  – 911 Call Sample  1990 compared to  2001

 

         Total 911 Calls:  1990    9,260     2002    22,773

 

Sheriff’s Office Staffing 1990 & 2002

1990                        2002

         Administrators                     5                 2

         Clerical Support                    6                 5

         Deputies                           22              29 *

         Detectives                           4                5

         Crime Lab                           3                1              

                  Total                       40              42

  * 5 unfilled deputy positions

 

Law Enforcement employee rates per 1,000 population [10/11/00]

        

                            Commissioned     Comm. Rate     Total         Total Rate

         Island                    36                      .71       42.00            .83

         Whatcom                66                      .89           79.00         1.06

             Yakima                  70                      .73         104.00         1.09

 

11% Reduction for Sheriff’s Department and  Consequences:

 

$516,721 or about 9.5 deputies

 

      Response time will increase

      Solvability of crimes will decrease

      Traffic enforcement will be near non-existent

      Motoring public will be at greater risk

      Loss of valuable personnel

 

      All  liabilities will soar

      Internal turmoil/stress/burnout will compound all of the above  

      Needless errors & poor judgment places  public &  employees at grave risk

 

To fill a 24/7 watch, at least  5-1/2 bodies are needed;  to staff two people 24 hrs./day  requires a   minimum of 11.  The Sheriff’s ability to do a lot of things is declining.  There is double staff during the day and swing shift, but 2:00 a.m. – 7:00 a.m. block of space without coverage.  Further cuts means going to an “on-call” deputy basis.  Internally starting to see the results:  applications being submitted for jobs elsewhere; employees are  uncertain, stressed out and burned out.   Those in law enforcement like to think they do their jobs because it is the right thing to do and have the backing and support of the public.  A poll is circulating around the office on a  no confidence vote in the Sheriff, an indicator of the and uncertainty and not feeling they have the backing of the Sheriff, Board or public.  Bottom line:  government  exists  primarily for the  protection of its people  and its property.  Keep in mind that employees in other departments are not asked to go out and risk their life.  He urged that some decision be made early on so as not to leave employees dangling.

 

Discussion.

 

The Commissioners and Sheriff discussed the funding problem and the actual dollars Island County will lose  in 2003, combined totals  in excess of  1-1/2 million dollars.  Commissioners Shelton, McDowell and Thorn each expressed the  primary mission and top priority and concern of government  was  public health and safety.  

 

One of the things Commissioner Thorn mentioned was that at the Town Meeting on Camano Island last month revenue problems were explained and he asked citizens what their priorities were for funding, and the result was that no one wanted to give up any programs and expressed reasonably strong support for law enforcement.  He was interested  in reviewing whether any revenue assistance could come from the County’s Rural County Designation that could perhaps go towards funding a deputy position.  Although those revenues are dedicated to business development and business infrastructure, he  thought there could be some rationale  that would make some sense.

 

Another point brought out by the Chairman was the possibility of  putting before the voters a 1/10th of 1% tax   as provided in House Bill 1477 recently enacted that could be used to pay for a  variety of projects and activities associated with emergency communications.  That could yield as much as $450,000 to $500,000 and go a long way toward paying the County’s commitment to I-COM now included within the Sheriff’s Budget from Current Expense.    The Chairman was willing to work with  organizations who have been very supportive of law enforcement in Island County to help  promote the proposition. 

 

Island County  Prosecuting Attorney’s Budget

Presentation by:       Greg Banks, Prosecutor  

Staff:                    Caroline Morse 

         Hand-out:              Copy of Overhead:  2003 Budget Presentation

 

The Prosecuting Attorney is an elected county officer mandated by Washington State  Constitution;  must be an attorney;  prosecutes crimes in the name of the State; is the legal advisor to other County Officials;  serves as the County’s legal representative and works to  advance and improve the justice system.    RCW 36.27.020.  The  hand-out explained with specific  detail the functions and duties of the Prosecuting Attorney in the following categories  [summarized]:

 

Criminal Function   [charts provided for each of the following]

 

         Prevent crime by keeping criminals off the street, out of schools, businesses and homes

Felony Prosecution, Felony Referrals, Filings &  Trends

Misdemeanor Cases; Juvenile Referrals,  Filings & Trends

 

Law Enforcement Agencies Served

 

Approximately 70 commissioned  local law enforcement officers = each

of the 6 criminal deputy  prosecutor’s serve an average over 11 officers  

        

         County; Oak Harbor; Coupeville; Langley; WSP; Liquor Control Bd.;

W. S. Parks; Fish & Wildlife; DSHS; NCIS; US Customs; Secret Service;

Postal Inspector 

 

Civil Function

         Provides legal advice to county offices and  represents the County in some lawsuits

Review County contracts; Island County Code reviser; enforces child support

Mental health commitments

Perform background checks on bail bondsmen

Member, Elections canvassing Board  and Justice Court Districting Committee

 

Organization of Prosecuting Attorney’s Office

        

                  Prosecutor  – elected

                  8 Attorneys -  6 Criminal Deputies; 2 Civil Deputies

         Support Staff:  Receptionist; Juvenile Legal Assistant; Misdemeanor Legal     Assistant; 2 Felony Legal Assistants; Civil Legal Assistant; Office Manager

 

Economics of County Legal Services

 

         State pays one-half of the  Prosecutor’s salary; Support Enforcement fully paid by the State            Total Cost – Prosecutor’s Office   $935,407

        

         Total  “billable” hours 18,180 for an average cost to the County per hour of legal    

         services  [including staff salary, benefits and M&O) $51.45/hour compared

         to Risk Pool attorneys at $125-165/hr plus expenses

        

         Increasing experience levels mean more efficient service with better outcomes

          

Efforts Resulting in Improved Efficiency  

 

·       Merge to  single office eliminated redundancy

·       Eliminated one level of management of attorneys w/commensurate lowering of paygrade

·       Laid off ½ time legal assistant; redistributed work loads

·       Reduced number of  attorneys in court

·       Office Administrator  cut costs

·       File destruction schedule & organization

·       File organization;  central filing

·       Greatly  reduced library costs [shared electronic]

·       Electronic case management system; standardized procedures on server

·       Electronic brief bank on server; all case documents stored on server

·       Designed/implemented multi-part scheduling order

·       Standardized forms on server

·       Probation violations handled on special calendar

·       Most efficient paternity unit in the State

 

11% Cut  in Expenditures 2003 Budget

 

                2002 Current Expense  $   946,153       

                2002 L&J Fund                    92,403

                                          $1,038,556

                  -State reimbursement   103,149              

                                        Total $    935,407

                  11% Reduction =     $102,894.77

                 

Outsourcing Considered

 

         “Bounceback”  - bad check cases – but would affect only 21 cases

 

          Appellate Counsel  for Hire   - not cost effective and gradually degrade institutional

          legal expertise gained from  having appellate  expert in house

 

         GMA appeals – tremendous cost w/downside of not having institutional knowledge at            end of the cases

 

         Drug Prosecution – outsource  felony drug prosecutions to a Snohomish County DPA,

             paid for by a State  grant; funding is uncertain; barely provides any advantage because

             of administrative overhead and management conflicts

 

Proposals  -  Prosecutor’s Office

        

·       Cut M&O  - many costs are unpredictable and no fat to cut

    

·       Eliminate 1 Attorney and 1 Assistant  $100,000

   -would be complete disaster, and create a combined civil/felony position

        -return  support staff level to  pre-1998

        -mistakes will be made, public safety and county liability  will suffer 

    

·       Eliminate 2 Attorney Positions  $120,000

 

 

         -would be a complete disaster

           -would cut Civil DPA and 1 Felony DPA

           -civil/GMA, deadbeat dad, appeals, probation violations and 0.5 FTE felony caseload                           distributed to  remainder

-       expect those not laid off would seek work elsewhere

-       many property crimes and drug cases would not be prosecuted

             

·       Eliminate 1 Attorney  $60,000

                -create combined civil/felony position

       -less than 11% [already laid off 0.5 FTE legal assistant]

       -push many non-violent felony cases into District Court as misdemeanors

       -would require cooperation from courts in re-scheduling certain calendars

 

·       Revenue and Grants 

         -No  ethical or advantageous means of raising revenue

         -Grants are unworkable for this size office.

 

Other County Budget Considerations/Suggestions

 

·       No more cuts until non-essential County functions and expenditures are cut

 

·       Other areas that warrant consideration - charitable donations of taxpayer dollars

 

     Whidbey Conservation District                             $10,000

     County Historical Society                        2,500

     Ebey’s Landing Historical Reserve                   10,000                 

     Oak Harbor Senior Center                        67,141

     Senior Services of Island County                    66,840

     Oak Harbor Adult Day Care                         10,609

     Camano Senior Center                                 45,835

            Senior Services Adult Day Care                 10,609

     EDC                                                    32,500

     NW Regional Council                                48,518

 

·       Consolidate small departments

 

Response to WSU Cooperative Extension Budget Workshop  comments April 22, 2002, with regard to 4-H  and where Don  Meehan had compared the cost of  justice to the cost of WSU preventative programs believing  the 4H program saves society and the County  hundreds and thousands of dollars keeping youth in safe and happy homes and engaged in activities.   Though Mr. Banks doubted that was true, even if it  were true he pointed out that numbers of  folks and organizations that spend numerous hours of volunteering with youth without expecting to be compensated.

 

Meeting at 11:35 a.m.     The Board will meet  in Regular Session on May 13, 2002,

beginning at 9:30 a.m.

 

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

ISLAND COUNTY, WASHINGTON

 

 

______________________________

Mike Shelton,  Chairman

                                                                 

                 

_____________________________

Wm. L. McDowell,   Member 

 

 

_____________________________

William F. Thorn,   Member

 

 

ATTEST: 

 

 

_________________­­­­­___________

Elaine Marlow, Clerk of the Board